RESUMO
Major strides in the advancement of spine surgery came about in the 21st century. However, the extensive history of spine surgery can be traced back to long before this time. A clear description of the journey from a primitive yet accurate understanding of the human musculoskeletal system to today's modern aspects of spinal techniques is lacking. A narrative literature review was conducted to elucidate where spine surgery began and the techniques used that evolved over time. This review was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar. Search terms used included "history of spine surgery," "evolution of spine surgery," "origins of spine surgery," "history of laminectomy," "history of spinal fusion," "history of lumbar interbody fusion," "minimally invasive spine surgery," and "navigation in spine surgery." We highlight the evolution of the basic understanding of anatomy and non-surgical and surgical techniques, including bracing, laminectomy, discectomy, and spinal fusion. The current evolution and integration of minimally invasive techniques, lumbar interbody fusion techniques, robotics, navigation, and motion preservation are discussed, as these are the major areas of focus for technological advancement. This review presents an overarching synopsis of the events that chronicle the progress made in spine surgery since its conception. The review uniquely contributes to the growing body of literature on the expansion of spine surgery and highlights major events in its history.
RESUMO
Purpose: Kienböck's disease consists of intrinsic and extrinsic characteristics that coalesce into a pathology with multifactorial etiology. Mechanical, morphological, and vascular factors have been identified as contributory. Radial osteotomy is one of the most commonly used surgical treatment for late-stage Kienböck's disease. Despite its frequent use and reported value, the specifics of radial osteotomy have not been described in aggregate. Our objective was to review the recent literature for descriptions of the radial osteotomy techniques used for treatment of Kienböck's disease. Methods: The inclusion criteria for the systematic review were as follows: (1) patients aged >18 years, (2) a publication date no older than 2012, and (3) a complete description of the distal radius osteotomy technique, including verbiage that specified numeric dimensions of bony resection or verbiage that detailed a goal in terms of a radiographic parameter that would guide the bony resection. Results: The studies were grouped according to the stated description of radial osteotomy. This process yielded the following three main groups: (1) studies that used radial shortening, (2) studies that used lateral closing wedge osteotomy or combined lateral closing wedge with radial shortening, and (3) novel osteotomy descriptions. Conclusions: The Kienböck's disease literature predominantly describes an osteotomy to shorten the radius by 2-3 mm. In some studies, the degree of radial shortening corresponded to the value necessary to achieve near-neutral ulnar variance. The common goal in using lateral closing wedge osteotomy was to achieve a radial inclination of 5° to 15°. Unique wedge resections, some with multiplanar corrections, have been recently described with each purporting specific advantages. Clinical relevance: Our findings support the premise of mechanical and biologic efficacy for radial osteotomy, with satisfactory results being reported across a wide spectrum of osteotomy techniques.
RESUMO
Complex periprosthetic fractures may occur with existing ipsilateral hip and knee implants. These cases are challenging with few options. We report on a custom coupler used to connect a hinged distal femoral replacement to an existing revision hip stem. This option was preferred to a total replacement of the femur. The custom coupler maintained the anatomic attachments of the proximal femur, preserved abductor strength during ambulation, and mitigated the morbidity which may arise from a total femur replacement. At 15 months postoperatively, the patient reported no pain, did not demonstrate an antalgic gait pattern, and had satisfactory range of motion at the hip and knee. The literature displays clinical and biomechanical efficacy for coupling devices although complications and device failure are quite variable.
